Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
POCO F9 Ultra
78.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
64.4Performance20
84.3Display36
78.2Camera33.1
92Battery38.8
78.7Features38.7
14 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 78.1 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+53) and display (+48). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 22% lower weight: 184 g vs 235 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
  • Lower launch price: $279 vs $799

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size6.9 ″+8%6.4 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2608x12002400x1080
Pixel density416 ppi+1%411 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+106%90 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+463%800 nits

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5MediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu—260,000
Geekbench 6 (single)—410Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,320Bottom 2%
RAM (max)16 GB+167%6 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera200 MP+213%64 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom5 x—
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+60%20 MP
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity8,050 mAh+61%5,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+567%15 W
Wireless charging50 W—

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight235 g184 g+22%
Thickness8.7 mm8.4 mm+4%
IP ratingIP68—
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackNoYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup