Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A35

WINNER
POCO F9 Ultra
78.1Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
64.4Performance31.4
84.3Display45.3
78.2Camera41.9
92Battery55.7
78.7Features70.7
13 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A35

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 78.1 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+39) and camera (+36). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 71

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • 11% lower weight: 209 g vs 235 g
  • Lower launch price: $399 vs $799

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
Screen size6.9 ″+5%6.6 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution2608x12001080x2340
Pixel density416 ppi+7%390 ppi
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits+350%1,000 nits
Screen-to-body—84.9 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5Samsung Exynos 1380
AnTuTu—743,075Bottom 17%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—292,456Bottom 21%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—87,904Bottom 18%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—133,634Bottom 7%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—229,081Bottom 21%
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,050Bottom 37%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—2,950Bottom 38%
RAM (max)16 GB+100%8 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB128/256GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1—

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP—
Optical zoom5 x+400%1 x
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera32 MP+146%13 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
Capacity8,050 mAh+61%5,000 mAh
Wired charging100 W+300%25 W
Wireless charging50 W0 W
Active use endurance—12 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
Weight235 g209 g+11%
Thickness8.7 mm8.2 mm+6%
IP ratingIP68IP67
Frame material—Plastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth6.05.3
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 14 (One UI 6.1)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Samsung Galaxy A35
SpecPOCO F9 UltraSamsung Galaxy A35
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup