Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Ultra vs vivo X200 FE

WINNER
POCO F9 Ultra
78.1Inno Score
VS
vivo X200 FE
67.7Inno Score
64.4Performance51.2
84.3Display76.3
78.2Camera60.5
92Battery85.5
78.7Features78.7
7 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra5 spec wins — vivo X200 FE

InnoReviews verdict

POCO F9 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 78.1 to 67.7, pulling ahead mainly in camera (+18) and performance (+13). vivo X200 FE still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 64 vs 51
  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 76
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 61
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 86
  • 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE

  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 21% lower weight: 186 g vs 235 g
  • 11% higher Pixel density: 460 ppi vs 416 ppi
  • 11% higher Peak brightness: 5,000 nits vs 4,500 nits

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
Screen size6.9 ″+9%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2608x12001216x2640
Pixel density416 ppi460 ppi+11%
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits5,000 nits+11%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
Geekbench 6 (single)—1,960Top 35%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—6,606Top 27%
Wild Life Extreme stability—60 %Bottom 22%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
Main camera200 MP+300%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.88
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom5 x+67%3 x
Max video8K@30fps4K@60fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
Capacity8,050 mAh+24%6,500 mAh
Wired charging100 W+11%90 W
Wireless charging50 W—
Active use endurance—15.3 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
Weight235 g186 g+21%
Thickness8.7 mm8 mm+9%
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus vivo X200 FE
SpecPOCO F9 Ultravivo X200 FE
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

POCO F9 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSPOCO F9 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSPOCO F9 Ultravs vivo X200 UltraVSPOCO F9 Ultravs iPhone 18 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 FEvs Samsung Galaxy S26VSvivo X200 FEvs REDMI K80 UltraVSvivo X200 FEvs Nothing Phone (3)VSvivo X200 FEvs Vivo X300 EVS

Try another matchup