Skip to content
InnoReviews

POCO F9 Ultra vs Vivo X300

POCO F9 Ultra
78.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
64.4Performance85.4
84.3Display73.5
78.2Camera78.1
92Battery87.2
78.7Features84
6 spec wins — POCO F9 Ultra5 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 78.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+21) and features (+5). POCO F9 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the POCO F9 Ultra

  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 74
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 87
  • 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
  • 54% higher Refresh rate: 185 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 33% higher capacity: 8,050 mAh vs 6,040 mAh

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 64
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 79
  • 56% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 32 MP
  • 25% higher OS update pledge: 5 years vs 4 years
  • 19% lower weight: 190 g vs 235 g

Display

Display comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
Screen size6.9 ″+9%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2608x12001216x2640
Pixel density416 ppi461 ppi+11%
Refresh rate185 Hz+54%120 Hz
Peak brightness4,500 nits4,500 nits
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu—3,416,530
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,446Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,843Top 8%
RAM (max)16 GB16 GB
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 4.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
Main camera200 MP200 MP
Main aperturef/1.68f/1.68
Ultra-wide50 MP50 MP
Telephoto50 MP50 MP
Optical zoom5 x+67%3 x
Max video8K@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera32 MP50 MP+56%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
Capacity8,050 mAh+33%6,040 mAh
Wired charging100 W+11%90 W
Wireless charging50 W+25%40 W
Active use endurance—17.5 h

Design

Design comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
Weight235 g190 g+19%
Thickness8.7 mm8 mm+9%
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame material—Aluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth6.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 3.2
eSIMYesYes

Software

Software comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge4 years5 years+25%

Audio

Audio comparison: POCO F9 Ultra versus Vivo X300
SpecPOCO F9 UltraVivo X300
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup