realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
46.7Performance27.1
69.4Display34.4
42.6Camera30.1
70.4Battery43.7
73.3Features49.3
13 spec wins — realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
InnoReviews verdict
realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 57.8 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+35) and battery (+27). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 69 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 70 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 73 vs 49
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- Has NFC — the other doesn't
Display
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.72 ″ | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 391 ppi+2% | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz+33% | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits+514% | 733 nits |
| Screen-to-body | 89.6 % | — |
Performance
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| AnTuTu | — | 510,132Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 211,597Bottom 7% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 43,559Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 110,374Bottom 3% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 144,602Bottom 2% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 728Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 1,943Bottom 14% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 96 %Top 48% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | — | 5 MP |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+23% | 13 MP |
| OIS | Yes | No |
Battery
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6,000 mAh+20% | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+220% | 25 W |
Design
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 179 g+10% | 200 g |
| Thickness | 7.6 mm+4% | 7.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP68/IP69/IP66 | IP54 |
| Frame material | — | Plastic |
Connectivity
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | — | No |
Software
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (Realme UI 6.0) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) |
| OS update pledge | — | 6 years |
Audio
| Spec | realme Narzo 80 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
realme Narzo 80 Pro 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S22 UltraVSrealme Narzo 80 Pro 5Gvs iQOO Z11 5G (India)VSrealme Narzo 80 Pro 5Gvs Vivo T5 5GVSrealme Narzo 80 Pro 5Gvs iQOO Z10VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VS