RedMagic 11 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
95.2Performance86.1
67.1Display61.6
51.5Camera50.2
96.2Battery67.5
86.7Features94.7
15 spec wins — RedMagic 11 Pro3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
InnoReviews verdict
RedMagic 11 Pro wins this phone face-off, 80.2 to 71.2, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+29) and performance (+9). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the RedMagic 11 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 95 vs 86
- Stronger display score: 67 vs 62
- Stronger battery score: 96 vs 68
- 300% higher Wireless charging: 80 W vs 20 W
- 78% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 45 W
- Lower launch price: $699 vs $1,900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 87
- 67% higher Peak brightness: 3,000 nits vs 1,800 nits
- 13% lower weight: 201 g vs 230 g
- 11% higher Screen size: 7.6 ″ vs 6.85 ″
Display
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.85 ″ | 7.6 ″+11% |
| Panel type | AMOLED | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1216x2688 | 2448x1848 |
| Pixel density | 431 ppi+7% | 404 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz+20% | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,800 nits | 3,000 nits+67% |
| Screen-to-body | 95.3 %+6% | 89.6 % |
Performance
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 3,229,764+10% | 2,947,517 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,745+6%Top 3% | 3,528Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 11,845+12%Top 2% | 10,619Top 4% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 75 %+43%Bottom 43% | 53 %Bottom 11% |
| RAM (max) | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB/512GB/1TB | 256GB/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.1 Pro | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 16 MP+60% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 7,500 mAh+56% | 4,800 mAh |
| Wired charging | 80 W+78% | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | 80 W+300% | 20 W |
| Active use endurance | 20 h+45% | 13.8 h |
Design
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 230 g | 201 g+13% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm+8% | 9.7 mm |
| IP rating | IPX8 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
Software
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (RedMagic OS 11) | Android 17 (One UI 9) |
| OS update pledge | — | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | RedMagic 11 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
RedMagic 11 Provs Xiaomi 17VSRedMagic 11 Provs POCO F8 UltraVSRedMagic 11 Provs OPPO Find X9s ProVSRedMagic 11 Provs POCO F9 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Samsung Galaxy S26+VSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 8vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS