Skip to content
InnoReviews

RedMagic 9S Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

WINNER
RedMagic 9S Pro

REDMAGIC

RedMagic 9S Pro

$649

62.4Inno Score
VS
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
56.6Performance20
57.1Display36
51.5Camera33.1
75.1Battery38.8
86.7Features38.7
12 spec wins — RedMagic 9S Pro5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

InnoReviews verdict

RedMagic 9S Pro wins this phone face-off, 62.4 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in features (+48) and performance (+37). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the RedMagic 9S Pro

  • Stronger performance score: 57 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 57 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 52 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 75 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 39

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 25% higher Front camera: 20 MP vs 16 MP
  • 20% lower weight: 184 g vs 229 g
  • Lower launch price: $279 vs $649

Display

Display comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Screen size6.8 ″+6%6.4 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Resolution1116x24802400x1080
Pixel density400 ppi411 ppi+3%
Refresh rate120 Hz+33%90 Hz
Peak brightness1,600 nits+100%800 nits
Screen-to-body93.7 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 Leading VersionMediaTek Helio G80
AnTuTu—260,000
Geekbench 6 (single)2,277+455%Top 24%410Bottom 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)7,097+438%Top 22%1,320Bottom 2%
RAM (max)16 GB+167%6 GB
Storage options256GB/512GB64GB / 128GB
Storage typeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1

Camera

Camera comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Main camera50 MP64 MP+28%
Main aperture—f/1.8
Ultra-wide50 MP+525%8 MP
Max video8K@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera16 MP20 MP+25%
OISYesNo

Battery

Battery comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Capacity6,500 mAh+30%5,000 mAh
Wired charging80 W+433%15 W
Wireless charging0 W—

Design

Design comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Weight229 g184 g+20%
Thickness8.9 mm8.4 mm+6%
Frame materialAluminumPlastic

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
5GYesNo
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
OS at launchAndroid 14 (RedMagic OS 9.5)Android 11 (One UI 3.1)
OS update pledge—4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: RedMagic 9S Pro versus Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
SpecRedMagic 9S ProSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5mm jackYesYes

Related comparisons

Try another matchup