Skip to content
InnoReviews

Redmi 17C (China) vs vivo X200 Pro mini

X
27.9Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Pro mini
72.8Inno Score
20Performance71.3
38.8Display73.8
20.5Camera65.5
40.3Battery74.7
20Features86.7
2 spec wins — Redmi 17C (China)14 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 27.9, pulling ahead mainly in features (+67) and performance (+51). Redmi 17C (China) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Redmi 17C (China)

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini

  • Stronger performance score: 71 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 39
  • Stronger camera score: 66 vs 21
  • Stronger battery score: 75 vs 40
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 20

Display

Display comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
Screen size6.88 ″+9%6.31 ″
Panel typeIPS LCDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution720x16401216x2640
Pixel density260 ppi460 ppi+77%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness600 nits4,500 nits+650%
Screen-to-body84 %90.5 %+8%

Performance

Performance comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G81 UltraMediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTu—2,439,691Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—716,503Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—837,229Top 29%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—328,282Top 35%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—557,677Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,589Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—8,078Top 18%
Wild Life Extreme stability—48 %Bottom 7%
RAM (max)4 GB16 GB+300%
Storage options64/128GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
Main camera13 MP50 MP+285%
Main aperturef/2.2f/1.57
Ultra-wide—50 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@60fps
Front camera5 MP32 MP+540%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
Capacity5,160 mAh5,700 mAh+10%
Wired charging18 W90 W+400%
Wireless charging—30 W

Design

Design comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
Weight206 g187 g+9%
Thickness8.2 mm8.2 mm+1%
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.45.4
NFCNoYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
OS at launchAndroid 16 (HyperOS 3)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)

Audio

Audio comparison: Redmi 17C (China) versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecRedmi 17C (China)vivo X200 Pro mini
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup