Skip to content
InnoReviews

Redmi Note 12 Turbo vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Redmi Note 12 Turbo
48.8Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
44Performance93.3
45.5Display82.3
44.1Camera84.6
58.4Battery91.5
60Features84
2 spec wins — Redmi Note 12 Turbo15 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 48.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+49) and camera (+40). Redmi Note 12 Turbo still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Redmi Note 12 Turbo

  • 22% lower weight: 181 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 44
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 46
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 44
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 58
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 60

Display

Display comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.67 ″6.82 ″+2%
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801440x3168
Pixel density395 ppi510 ppi+29%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body—90.3 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSnapdragon 7+ Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu1,263,7614,085,695+223%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,430Top 46%3,730+161%Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,150Top 46%11,494+177%Top 3%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options256GB / 512GB / 1TB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera16 MP50 MP+213%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,600 mAh+32%
Wired charging67 W100 W+49%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
Weight181 g+22%232 g
Thickness7.9 mm+4%8.2 mm
IP ratingIP53IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 13 (MIUI 14)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge2 years5 years+150%

Audio

Audio comparison: Redmi Note 12 Turbo versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecRedmi Note 12 TurboVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Redmi Note 12 Turbovs POCO F5VSRedmi Note 12 Turbovs Samsung Galaxy A37 5GVSRedmi Note 12 Turbovs nubia Air ProVSRedmi Note 12 Turbovs Infinix NOTE 50 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS

Try another matchup