Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Sharp AQUOS R11

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Sharp AQUOS R11
60.2Inno Score
27.1Performance46.7
34.4Display76.2
30.1Camera68.3
43.7Battery50.1
49.3Features73.3
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G14 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R11

InnoReviews verdict

Sharp AQUOS R11 wins this phone face-off, 60.2 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+42) and camera (+38). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 100% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 3 years
  • 11% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 8.9 mm

Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11

  • Stronger performance score: 47 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 68 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 50 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 73 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
Screen size6.7 ″+3%6.5 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO Pro IGZO OLED
Resolution1080x23401080x2340
Pixel density385 ppi396 ppi+3%
Refresh rate90 Hz240 Hz+167%
Peak brightness733 nits3,600 nits+391%
Screen-to-body—89.8 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
AnTuTu510,132Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)211,597Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)43,559Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)110,374Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)144,602Bottom 2%—
Geekbench 6 (single)728Bottom 13%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,943Bottom 13%—
Wild Life Extreme stability96 %Top 47%—
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
Main camera50 MP50 MP+1%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide5 MP50 MP+906%
Telephoto—39 MP
Optical zoom—2.9 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+287%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
Capacity5,000 mAh5,100 mAh+2%
Wired charging25 W36 W+44%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
Weight200 g195 g+2%
Thickness7.9 mm+11%8.9 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16
OS update pledge6 years+100%3 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Sharp AQUOS R11
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GSharp AQUOS R11
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup