Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Ulefone Armor 22 Pro
27.1Performance28.9
34.4Display44.5
30.1Camera30.6
43.7Battery62.9
49.3Features46.7
5 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G7 spec wins — Ulefone Armor 22 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Ulefone Armor 22 Pro wins this phone face-off, 40.9 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+19) and display (+10). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 63% higher Peak brightness: 733 nits vs 450 nits
- 63% higher Front camera: 13 MP vs 8 MP
- 47% lower thickness: 7.9 mm vs 15 mm
- 38% lower weight: 200 g vs 324 g
Reasons to pick the Ulefone Armor 22 Pro
- Stronger display score: 45 vs 34
- Stronger battery score: 63 vs 44
- 33% higher Refresh rate: 120 Hz vs 90 Hz
- 32% higher capacity: 6,600 mAh vs 5,000 mAh
- 32% higher Wired charging: 33 W vs 25 W
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″+2% | 6.58 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | — |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2408 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 401 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 733 nits+63% | 450 nits |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G200 |
| AnTuTu | 510,132Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 211,597Bottom 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,559Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,374Bottom 3% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,602Bottom 2% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 728Bottom 13% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,943Bottom 13% | — |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 96 %Top 47% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 128GB/256GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP+28% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.89 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | — |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP+63% | 8 MP |
| OIS | No | — |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W+32% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+38% | 324 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+47% | 15 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69K |
| Frame material | Plastic | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | No |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | Ulefone Armor 22 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | — |
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VSUlefone Armor 22 Provs iPhone 12 ProVSUlefone Armor 22 Provs Lava Bold 5GVSUlefone Armor 22 Provs Motorola Moto G67 Power 5GVSUlefone Armor 22 Provs Nothing Phone (3a) LiteVS