Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs vivo X200 FE

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 FE
67.7Inno Score
27.1Performance51.2
34.4Display76.3
30.1Camera60.5
43.7Battery85.5
49.3Features78.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G15 spec wins — vivo X200 FE

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 FE wins this phone face-off, 67.7 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+42) and battery (+42). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 61% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 96 % vs 60 %
  • 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
Screen size6.7 ″+6%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401216x2640
Pixel density385 ppi460 ppi+19%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness733 nits5,000 nits+582%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
AnTuTu510,132Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)211,597Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)43,559Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)110,374Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)144,602Bottom 2%—
Geekbench 6 (single)728Bottom 13%1,960+169%Top 35%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,943Bottom 13%6,606+240%Top 27%
Wild Life Extreme stability96 %+61%Top 47%60 %Bottom 22%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.88
Ultra-wide5 MP8 MP+60%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@60fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
Capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh+30%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Active use endurance—15.3 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
Weight200 g186 g+7%
Thickness7.9 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge6 years+50%4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X200 FE
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup