Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs vivo X200 Pro mini
27.1Performance71.3
34.4Display73.8
30.1Camera65.5
43.7Battery74.7
49.3Features86.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G19 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+44) and display (+39). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
- 99% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 96 % vs 48 %
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 34
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 49
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″+6% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 460 ppi+19% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 733 nits | 4,500 nits+514% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 11 | 510,132Bottom 3% | 2,439,691+378%Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 211,597Bottom 7% | 716,503+239%Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,559Bottom 3% | 837,229+1822%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,374Bottom 3% | 328,282+197%Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,602Bottom 2% | 557,677+286%Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 728Bottom 13% | 2,589+256%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,943Bottom 13% | 8,078+316%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | 96 %+99%Top 47% | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+3% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 4G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs HONOR X6cVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs OnePlus N6xVSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs POCO C85VSSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvs realme C63VSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS