Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs Vivo X300

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
27.1Performance85.4
34.4Display73.5
30.1Camera78.1
43.7Battery87.2
49.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G16 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+58) and camera (+48). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 20% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 5 years

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
Screen size6.7 ″+6%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401216x2640
Pixel density385 ppi461 ppi+20%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness733 nits4,500 nits+514%
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared510,132Bottom 3%3,416,530
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)211,597Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)43,559Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)110,374Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)144,602Bottom 2%—
Geekbench 6 (single)728Bottom 13%3,446+373%Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,943Bottom 13%9,843+407%Top 8%
Wild Life Extreme stability96 %Top 47%—
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide5 MP50 MP+900%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
Capacity5,000 mAh6,040 mAh+21%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—17.5 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
Weight200 g190 g+5%
Thickness7.9 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge6 years+20%5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4GVivo X300
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup