Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G vs vivo X300 FE

Samsung Galaxy A16 4G
34.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X300 FE
73Inno Score
27.1Performance67.9
34.4Display76.7
30.1Camera60.5
43.7Battery84
49.3Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 4G15 spec wins — vivo X300 FE

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X300 FE wins this phone face-off, 73 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in display (+42) and performance (+41). Samsung Galaxy A16 4G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 4G

  • 25% higher Wild Life Extreme stability: 96 % vs 77 %
  • 20% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 5 years

Reasons to pick the vivo X300 FE

  • Stronger performance score: 68 vs 27
  • Stronger display score: 77 vs 34
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 30
  • Stronger battery score: 84 vs 44
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 49

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
Screen size6.7 ″+6%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1080x23401216x2640
Pixel density385 ppi460 ppi+19%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness733 nits5,000 nits+582%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G99Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu510,132Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)211,597Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)43,559Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)110,374Bottom 3%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)144,602Bottom 2%—
Geekbench 6 (single)728Bottom 13%2,857+292%Top 18%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,943Bottom 13%9,276+377%Top 13%
Wild Life Extreme stability96 %+25%Top 47%77 %Bottom 45%
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide5 MP8 MP+60%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video1080p@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
Capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh+30%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging—40 W

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
Weight200 g191 g+4%
Thickness7.9 mm+1%8 mm
IP ratingIP54IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.36.0
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge6 years+20%5 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A16 4G versus vivo X300 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A16 4Gvivo X300 FE
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup