Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs vivo T3 Pro 5G
27.1Performance28.9
36.6Display69.9
30.1Camera42.6
55.7Battery65.7
65.3Features52
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G13 spec wins — vivo T3 Pro 5G
InnoReviews verdict
vivo T3 Pro 5G wins this phone face-off, 49.5 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+33) and camera (+13). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Stronger features score: 65 vs 52
- 200% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 2 years
- Has NFC — the other doesn't
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo T3 Pro 5G
- Stronger display score: 70 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 43 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 66 vs 56
- 463% higher Peak brightness: 4,500 nits vs 800 nits
- 220% higher Wired charging: 80 W vs 25 W
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.77 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2392 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 388 ppi+1% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | 85.2 % | 90.3 %+6% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| AnTuTu | 509,232Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 210,242Bottom 5% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,774Bottom 4% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,272Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,944Bottom 3% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 740Bottom 16% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,050Bottom 20% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 128/256GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 8 MP+60% |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | — |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP+23% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh+10% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 80 W+220% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g | 184 g+8% |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 7.5 mm+5% |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP64 |
| Frame material | Plastic | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 14 (Funtouch OS 14) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+200% | 2 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo T3 Pro 5G |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs vivo Y600iVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO M6 Plus 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Lava Play Ultra 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X7eVSvivo T3 Pro 5Gvs Vivo Y500 (4G)VSvivo T3 Pro 5Gvs Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025)VSvivo T3 Pro 5Gvs realme NARZO 70 Turbo 5GVSvivo T3 Pro 5Gvs Motorola Razr (2026)VS