Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs Vivo X200 Pro
27.1Performance74.5
36.6Display73.2
30.1Camera72
55.7Battery79.9
65.3Features78.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G19 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+47) and camera (+42). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- 50% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 4 years
- 10% lower weight: 200 g vs 223 g
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $199 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 56
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.78 ″+1% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 452 ppi+17% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | 85.2 % | 90.3 %+6% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 210,242Top 97% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 43,774Top 100% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 110,272Top 100% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 144,944Top 100% | — |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 509,232Top 77% | 2,550,000+401%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 740Top 81% | 2,800+278%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,050Top 78% | 8,600+320%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3.7 x+270% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | 13 h+8% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+10% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+7% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+50% | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Redmi Note 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs iPhone SE (3rd gen)VSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs iPhone 12VSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs iPhone 12 miniVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VS