Samsung Galaxy A16 5G vs vivo X200 Pro mini
27.1Performance71.3
36.6Display73.8
30.1Camera65.5
55.7Battery74.7
65.3Features86.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A16 5G21 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 39.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+44) and display (+37). Samsung Galaxy A16 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 27
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 37
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 30
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 56
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″+6% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 460 ppi+19% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | 85.2 % | 90.5 %+6% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 11 | 509,232Bottom 2% | 2,439,691+379%Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 210,242Bottom 5% | 716,503+241%Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 43,774Bottom 4% | 837,229+1813%Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 110,272Bottom 2% | 328,282+198%Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 144,944Bottom 3% | 557,677+285%Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 740Bottom 16% | 2,589+250%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,050Bottom 20% | 8,078+294%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3 x+200% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g | 187 g+6% |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm+3% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A16 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs vivo Y600iVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs POCO M6 Plus 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs Lava Play Ultra 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A16 5Gvs HONOR X7eVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS