Samsung Galaxy A17 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra
29.1Performance74.3
44Display76.1
41.9Camera75.8
43.7Battery82.8
65.3Features86.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A17 5G12 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and battery (+39). Samsung Galaxy A17 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 17% lower weight: 192 g vs 232 g
- 14% lower thickness: 7.5 mm vs 8.7 mm
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.82 ″+2% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 510 ppi+32% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| AnTuTu | 603,772Bottom 11% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 245,695Bottom 13% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 42,916Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 129,349Bottom 4% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 185,812Bottom 11% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 988Bottom 28% | 3,062+210%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,093Bottom 21% | 9,410+350%Top 11% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 49 %Bottom 8% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.69 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3.7 x+270% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.6 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 192 g+17% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm+14% | 8.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Xiaomi 13 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 20 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Huawei nova 12 SEVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS