Samsung Galaxy A17 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
29.1Performance93.3
44Display82.3
41.9Camera84.6
43.7Battery91.5
65.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A17 5G14 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and battery (+48). Samsung Galaxy A17 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 20% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 5 years
- 17% lower weight: 192 g vs 232 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 44
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.82 ″+2% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 510 ppi+32% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz+60% |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 603,772Bottom 11% | 4,085,695 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 245,695Bottom 13% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 42,916Bottom 2% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 129,349Bottom 4% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 185,812Bottom 11% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 988Bottom 28% | 3,730+278%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,093Bottom 21% | 11,494+449%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3.7 x+270% |
| Max video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 100 W+300% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 192 g+17% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm+8% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP54 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+20% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 30 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Xiaomi 13 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs TECNO SPARK 20 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy A17 5Gvs Huawei nova 12 SEVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS