Samsung Galaxy A27 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra
28.9Performance93.3
45.6Display82.3
41.7Camera84.6
57.7Battery91.5
73.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A27 5G13 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 45, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and camera (+43). Samsung Galaxy A27 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A27 5G
- 20% higher OS update pledge: 6 years vs 5 years
- 14% lower weight: 200 g vs 232 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 58
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.82 ″+2% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 510 ppi+32% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | 86.8 % | 90.3 %+4% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | — | 4,085,695 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 3,730Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 11,494Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 5 MP | 50 MP+900% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 100 W+300% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | 12.7 h | 16 h+26% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 200 g+14% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm+5% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP64 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years+20% | 5 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A27 5G | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A27 5Gvs Nothing Phone (1)VSSamsung Galaxy A27 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE4 Lite 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A27 5Gvs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A27 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy A35VSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS