Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) vs Vivo X200 Pro
20Performance74.5
36Display73.2
33.1Camera72
38.8Battery79.9
38.7Features78.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)16 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+55) and battery (+41). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 17% lower weight: 184 g vs 223 g
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $279 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 20
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 33
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 39
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.4 ″ | 6.78 ″+6% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 411 ppi | 452 ppi+10% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 260,000Top 96% | 2,550,000+881%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 410Top 97% | 2,800+583%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,320Top 97% | 8,600+552%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Storage options | 64GB / 128GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP+28% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP+60% |
| OIS | No | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 90 W+500% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 184 g+17% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+1% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs iPhone XRVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi Note 9 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Xiaomi Mi 11 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vs Redmi 12VSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VS