Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) vs vivo X200 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
20Performance74.3
36Display76.1
33.1Camera75.8
38.8Battery82.8
38.7Features86.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)14 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+54) and features (+48). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
  • 21% lower weight: 184 g vs 232 g
  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 39

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.4 ″6.82 ″+7%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801440x3168
Pixel density411 ppi510 ppi+24%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—90.2 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G80Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu260,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)410Bottom 3%3,062+647%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,320Bottom 2%9,410+613%Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)6 GB16 GB+167%
Storage options64GB / 128GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
Main camera64 MP+28%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh+20%
Wired charging15 W90 W+500%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
Weight184 g+21%232 g
Thickness8.4 mm+3%8.7 mm
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 11 (One UI 3.1)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)vivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup