Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) vs Vivo X300

Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)
31.4Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
20Performance85.4
36Display73.5
33.1Camera78.1
38.8Battery87.2
38.7Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)18 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 31.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+65) and battery (+48). Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G)

  • Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 20
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 36
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 33
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 39
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 39

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
Screen size6.4 ″+1%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution2400x10801216x2640
Pixel density411 ppi461 ppi+12%
Refresh rate90 Hz120 Hz+33%
Peak brightness800 nits4,500 nits+463%
Screen-to-body—90.1 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
ChipsetMediaTek Helio G80MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu260,0003,416,530+1214%
Geekbench 6 (single)410Bottom 3%3,446+740%Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,320Bottom 2%9,843+646%Top 8%
RAM (max)6 GB16 GB+167%
Storage options64GB / 128GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeeMMC 5.1UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
Main camera64 MP200 MP+213%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom—3 x
Max video4K@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera20 MP50 MP+150%
OISNoYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
Capacity5,000 mAh6,040 mAh+21%
Wired charging15 W90 W+500%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—17.5 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
Weight184 g+3%190 g
Thickness8.4 mm8 mm+5%
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
5GNoYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
OS at launchAndroid 11 (One UI 3.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge4 years5 years+25%

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A32 (4G) versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A32 (4G)Vivo X300
Stereo speakersNoYes
3.5mm jackYesNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup