Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Sharp AQUOS R11
31.4Performance46.7
45.3Display76.2
41.9Camera68.3
55.7Battery50.1
70.7Features73.3
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3513 spec wins — Sharp AQUOS R11
InnoReviews verdict
Sharp AQUOS R11 wins this phone face-off, 60.2 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+31) and camera (+26). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- Stronger battery score: 56 vs 50
- 33% higher OS update pledge: 4 years vs 3 years
Reasons to pick the Sharp AQUOS R11
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 68 vs 42
- 529% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
- 287% higher Front camera: 50 MP vs 13 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″+2% | 6.5 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO Pro IGZO OLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1080x2340 |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 396 ppi+2% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz+100% |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 3,600 nits+260% |
| Screen-to-body | 84.9 % | 89.8 %+6% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 |
| AnTuTu | 743,075Bottom 15% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 292,456Bottom 19% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 87,904Bottom 15% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 133,634Bottom 8% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 229,081Bottom 19% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Bottom 36% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,950Bottom 37% | — |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP+1% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+529% |
| Telephoto | — | 39 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 2.9 x+190% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+287% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,100 mAh+2% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 36 W+44% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | — |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 209 g | 195 g+7% |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm+8% | 8.9 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 |
| OS update pledge | 4 years+33% | 3 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Sharp AQUOS R11 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FEVSSharp AQUOS R11vs HONOR 200 ProVSSharp AQUOS R11vs Huawei Pura 80VSSharp AQUOS R11vs OPPO Reno15 (Global)VS

