Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs vivo X200 FE

Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 FE
67.7Inno Score
31.4Performance51.2
45.3Display76.3
41.9Camera60.5
55.7Battery85.5
70.7Features78.7
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3514 spec wins — vivo X200 FE

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 FE wins this phone face-off, 67.7 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+31) and battery (+30). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 FE

  • Stronger performance score: 51 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 86 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 79 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
Screen size6.6 ″+5%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401216x2640
Pixel density390 ppi460 ppi+18%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits5,000 nits+400%
Screen-to-body84.9 %90.2 %+6%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
AnTuTu743,075Bottom 17%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)292,456Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)87,904Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)133,634Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)229,081Bottom 21%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%1,960+87%Top 35%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,950Bottom 38%6,606+124%Top 27%
Wild Life Extreme stability—60 %Bottom 22%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB
Storage type—UFS 3.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.88
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom1 x3 x+200%
Max video4K@30fps4K@60fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
Capacity5,000 mAh6,500 mAh+30%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging0 W—
Active use endurance12 h15.3 h+28%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
Weight209 g186 g+11%
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+3%
IP ratingIP67IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15)
OS update pledge4 years4 years

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 FE
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 FE
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSvivo X200 FEvs Samsung Galaxy S26VSvivo X200 FEvs REDMI K80 UltraVSvivo X200 FEvs Nothing Phone (3)VSvivo X200 FEvs Vivo X300 EVS

Try another matchup