Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs vivo X200 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
31.4Performance74.3
45.3Display76.1
41.9Camera75.8
55.7Battery82.8
70.7Features86.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3514 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+43) and camera (+34). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

  • 10% lower weight: 209 g vs 232 g

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.6 ″6.82 ″+3%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401440x3168
Pixel density390 ppi510 ppi+31%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body84.9 %90.2 %+6%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu743,075Bottom 17%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)292,456Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)87,904Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)133,634Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)229,081Bottom 21%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%3,062+192%Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,950Bottom 38%9,410+219%Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom1 x3.7 x+270%
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
Capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh+20%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging0 W40 W
Active use endurance12 h13.6 h+13%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
Weight209 g+10%232 g
Thickness8.2 mm+6%8.7 mm
IP ratingIP67IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35vivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup