Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo X300

Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300
81.8Inno Score
31.4Performance85.4
45.3Display73.5
41.9Camera78.1
55.7Battery87.2
70.7Features84
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3518 spec wins — Vivo X300

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+54) and camera (+36). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300

  • Stronger performance score: 85 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 78 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 87 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
Screen size6.6 ″+5%6.31 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401216x2640
Pixel density390 ppi461 ppi+18%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body84.9 %90.1 %+6%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared743,075Bottom 17%3,416,530
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)292,456Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)87,904Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)133,634Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)229,081Bottom 21%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%3,446+228%Top 7%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,950Bottom 38%9,843+234%Top 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.68
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom1 x3 x+200%
Max video4K@30fps4K@120fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
Capacity5,000 mAh6,040 mAh+21%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging0 W40 W
Active use endurance12 h17.5 h+46%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
Weight209 g190 g+9%
Thickness8.2 mm8 mm+3%
IP ratingIP67IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge4 years5 years+25%

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup