Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo X300 E

Samsung Galaxy A35
45.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 E
67.9Inno Score
31.4Performance46.7
45.3Display84
41.9Camera60.5
55.7Battery81.6
70.7Features86.7
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3510 spec wins — Vivo X300 E

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 E wins this phone face-off, 67.9 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in display (+39) and battery (+26). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E

  • Stronger performance score: 47 vs 31
  • Stronger display score: 84 vs 45
  • Stronger camera score: 61 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 82 vs 56
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
Screen size6.6 ″6.59 ″
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Resolution1080x23401260x2750
Pixel density390 ppi459 ppi+18%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,000 nits5,000 nits+400%
Screen-to-body84.9 %—

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
AnTuTu743,075Bottom 17%—
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)292,456Bottom 21%—
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)87,904Bottom 18%—
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)133,634Bottom 7%—
AnTuTu 11 (UX)229,081Bottom 21%—
Geekbench 6 (single)1,050Bottom 37%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,950Bottom 38%—
RAM (max)8 GB12 GB+50%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB
Storage type—UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP8 MP
Telephoto—50 MP
Optical zoom1 x3 x+200%
Max video4K@30fps—
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
Capacity5,000 mAh7,200 mAh+44%
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging0 W—
Active use endurance12 h—

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
Weight209 g200 g+4%
Thickness8.2 mm7.8 mm+5%
IP ratingIP67IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 2.0
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy A35 versus Vivo X300 E
SpecSamsung Galaxy A35Vivo X300 E
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup