Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
31.4Performance93.3
45.3Display82.3
41.9Camera84.6
55.7Battery91.5
70.7Features84
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A3519 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 45.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+62) and camera (+43). Samsung Galaxy A35 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A35
- 10% lower weight: 209 g vs 232 g
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 31
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 45
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 56
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 71
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.6 ″ | 6.82 ″+3% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 510 ppi+31% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 4,500 nits+350% |
| Screen-to-body | 84.9 % | 90.3 %+6% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 743,075Bottom 17% | 4,085,695 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 292,456Bottom 21% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 87,904Bottom 18% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 133,634Bottom 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 229,081Bottom 21% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Bottom 37% | 3,730+255%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,950Bottom 38% | 11,494+290%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP+300% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | 1 x | 3.7 x+270% |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 50 MP+285% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 100 W+300% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | 12 h | 16 h+33% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 209 g+10% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 14 (One UI 6.1) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 5 years+25% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A35vs realme C85 ProVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs OPPO Reno12 F 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs realme P3 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A35vs Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5GVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS