Samsung Galaxy A36 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra
34.7Performance74.3
46.2Display76.1
41.7Camera75.8
52.5Battery82.8
89.3Features86.7
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A36 5G11 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 47.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+40) and camera (+34). Samsung Galaxy A36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A36 5G
- 16% lower weight: 195 g vs 232 g
- 15% lower thickness: 7.4 mm vs 8.7 mm
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 74 vs 35
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 46
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 53
- 525% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 8 MP
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 6.82 ″+2% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 510 ppi+32% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| AnTuTu | 816,934Bottom 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 304,148Bottom 27% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 133,245Bottom 37% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 150,052Bottom 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 229,489Bottom 22% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,016Bottom 33% | 3,062+201%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,902Bottom 35% | 9,410+224%Top 11% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 49 %Bottom 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.69 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 0 W | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.6 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 195 g+16% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm+15% | 8.7 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A36 5G | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OnePlus Nord CE6 LiteVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs OPPO A7 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs Tecno Camon Slim 4GVSSamsung Galaxy A36 5Gvs HMD SkylineVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS