Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo X200 Pro
23.1Performance74.5
35.6Display73.2
48.4Camera72
39Battery79.9
54.7Features78.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A5213 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+51) and battery (+41). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 28% higher Main camera: 64 MP vs 50 MP
- 15% lower weight: 189 g vs 223 g
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
- Lower launch price: $349 vs $1,099
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 55
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 ″ | 6.78 ″+4% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 452 ppi+12% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz+33% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 395,000Top 85% | 2,550,000+546%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 730Top 83% | 2,800+284%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,900Top 87% | 8,600+353%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP+28% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+15% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm+1% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 4 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |