Samsung Galaxy A52 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
23.1Performance93.3
35.6Display82.3
48.4Camera84.6
39Battery91.5
54.7Features84
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy A5217 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 37, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+70) and battery (+53). Samsung Galaxy A52 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy A52
- 19% lower weight: 189 g vs 232 g
- Has 3.5mm jack — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 23
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 36
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 48
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 39
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 55
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.5 ″ | 6.82 ″+5% |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 510 ppi+26% |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz+60% |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 4,500 nits+463% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 720G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 395,000 | 4,085,695+934% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 730Bottom 13% | 3,730+411%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,900Bottom 12% | 11,494+505%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP+213% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | — | 200 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP+56% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,600 mAh+47% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 100 W+300% |
| Wireless charging | — | 40 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 189 g+19% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.2 mm+3% |
| IP rating | IP67 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Plastic | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | No | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 11 (One UI 3.1) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 5 years+25% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |