Samsung Galaxy F36 5G vs vivo X200 Pro mini
28.9Performance71.3
59.2Display73.8
41.9Camera65.5
43.7Battery74.7
65.3Features86.7
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy F36 5G8 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 44.2, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and battery (+31). Samsung Galaxy F36 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy F36 5G
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 59
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 42
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 44
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 65
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″+6% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | Super AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 460 ppi+19% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1380 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu | — | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | — | 2,589Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | — | 8,078Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Storage options | 128/256GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 8 MP | 50 MP+525% |
| Telephoto | — | 50 MP |
| Optical zoom | — | 3 x |
| Max video | 4K@30fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP+146% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,700 mAh+14% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | — | 30 W |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 197 g | 187 g+5% |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm+6% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | — | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | — | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 2.0 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | No | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 6 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy F36 5G | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs iQOO Z11xVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Nothing Phone (4b)VSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs OPPO F29 5GVSSamsung Galaxy F36 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy M36 5GVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS