Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy M35 5G vs vivo X200 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
43.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Ultra
77.9Inno Score
28.9Performance74.3
44.4Display76.1
41.9Camera75.8
53.1Battery82.8
70.7Features86.7
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M35 5G9 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and camera (+34). Samsung Galaxy M35 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 76 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 76 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 83 vs 53
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Screen size6.6 ″6.82 ″+3%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401440x3168
Pixel density390 ppi510 ppi+31%
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body83.8 %90.2 %+8%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,062Top 12%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—9,410Top 11%
Wild Life Extreme stability—49 %Bottom 8%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Main camera50 MP50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.69
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Capacity6,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Wired charging25 W90 W+260%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—13.6 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Weight222 g+4%232 g
Thickness9.1 mm8.7 mm+4%
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge4 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus vivo X200 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvivo X200 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs TECNO POVA Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Moto G55 5GVSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS

Try another matchup