Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy M35 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy M35 5G
43.6Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Vivo X300 Ultra
88.1Inno Score
28.9Performance93.3
44.4Display82.3
41.9Camera84.6
53.1Battery91.5
70.7Features84
1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy M35 5G14 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra

InnoReviews verdict

Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 43.6, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and camera (+43). Samsung Galaxy M35 5G still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy M35 5G

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 82 vs 44
  • Stronger camera score: 85 vs 42
  • Stronger battery score: 92 vs 53
  • Stronger features score: 84 vs 71

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Screen size6.6 ″6.82 ″+3%
Panel typeSuper AMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution1080x23401440x3168
Pixel density390 ppi510 ppi+31%
Refresh rate120 Hz144 Hz+20%
Peak brightness1,000 nits4,500 nits+350%
Screen-to-body83.8 %90.3 %+8%

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu—4,085,695
Geekbench 6 (single)—3,730Top 3%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—11,494Top 3%
RAM (max)8 GB16 GB+100%
Storage options128/256GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Main camera50 MP200 MP+300%
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.9
Ultra-wide8 MP50 MP+525%
Telephoto—200 MP
Optical zoom—3.7 x
Max video4K@30fps8K@30fps
Front camera13 MP50 MP+285%
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Capacity6,000 mAh6,600 mAh+10%
Wired charging25 W100 W+300%
Wireless charging—40 W
Active use endurance—16 h

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Weight222 g+4%232 g
Thickness9.1 mm8.2 mm+10%
IP rating—IP68/IP69
Frame materialPlasticAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.35.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 2.0USB-C 3.2
eSIMNoYes

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
OS at launchAndroid 14 (One UI 6.1)Android 16 (OriginOS 6)
OS update pledge4 years5 years+25%

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy M35 5G versus Vivo X300 Ultra
SpecSamsung Galaxy M35 5GVivo X300 Ultra
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Samsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Infinix HOT 50 Pro+VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Samsung Galaxy S21VSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs TECNO POVA Slim 5GVSSamsung Galaxy M35 5Gvs Moto G55 5GVSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS

Try another matchup