Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26+
29.1Performance82.4
55.1Display66
56.4Camera47.3
41.7Battery71.7
73.3Features94.7
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra11 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S26+
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S26+ wins this phone face-off, 71.2 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+53) and battery (+30). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- Stronger camera score: 56 vs 47
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 20% higher telephoto: 12 MP vs 10 MP
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Stronger performance score: 82 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 66 vs 55
- Stronger battery score: 72 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 95 vs 73
- 335% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 11,515 vs 2,650
- Lower launch price: $1,100 vs $1,299
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+3% | 6.7 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 3120x1440 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi | 516 ppi+4% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 2,600 nits+73% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.7 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,393+277%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 11,515+335%Top 2% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP+20% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,900 mAh+9% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W+80% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 20 W+33% |
| Active use endurance | — | 16.4 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g | 190 g+9% |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.3 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (One UI 8.5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 7 years+133% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26+ |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Google Pixel 11 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8VSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs Vivo X500 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S26+vs iQOO Z10 TurboVS