Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
29.1Performance74.5
55.1Display73.2
56.4Camera72
41.7Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra12 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and battery (+38). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 35% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3.7 x
- 10% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,299
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+10% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 4,500 nits+200% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 500,000Top 77% | 2,550,000+410%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Top 78% | 2,800+211%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Top 72% | 8,600+225%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP+1567% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+35% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,000 mAh+33% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g+7% | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm+5% | 8.5 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix Note 60VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs OnePlus 9VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Samsung Galaxy S22VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs iPhone 13 ProVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VS