Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs vivo X200 Pro mini
29.1Performance71.3
55.1Display73.8
56.4Camera65.5
41.7Battery74.7
73.3Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra11 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and battery (+33). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini
- Stronger performance score: 71 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 66 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 75 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+8% | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 4,500 nits+200% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 500,000 | 2,439,691Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 716,503Top 28% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 837,229Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 328,282Top 35% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 557,677Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 2,589+188%Top 21% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 8,078+205%Top 18% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 48 %Bottom 7% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 4K@60fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP+220% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,700 mAh+27% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g | 187 g+10% |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm+1% | 8.2 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | vivo X200 Pro mini |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSvivo X200 Pro minivs Google Pixel 11 Pro XLVSvivo X200 Pro minivs Huawei nova 16 UltraVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iPhone 17 Pro MaxVSvivo X200 Pro minivs iQOO 15RVS