Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300
29.1Performance85.4
55.1Display73.5
56.4Camera78.1
41.7Battery87.2
73.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra15 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+56) and battery (+46). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+8% | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 4,500 nits+200% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | 3,416,530+583% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,446+283%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 9,843+271%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 6,040 mAh+34% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 17.5 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g | 190 g+9% |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm+2% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS