Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300 E
29.1Performance46.7
55.1Display84
56.4Camera60.5
41.7Battery81.6
73.3Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra8 spec wins — Vivo X300 E
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 E wins this phone face-off, 67.9 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+40) and display (+29). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 50% higher ultra-wide: 12 MP vs 8 MP
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 E
- Stronger performance score: 47 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 84 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 61 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 82 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+5% | 6.59 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2750 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+8% | 459 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | 5,000 nits+233% |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP+50% | 8 MP |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | — |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 7,200 mAh+60% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | — |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g | 200 g+4% |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.8 mm+4% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 2.0 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300 E |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSVivo X300 Evs Nothing Phone (3)VSVivo X300 Evs Huawei Mate 80VSVivo X300 Evs 8849 Tank 5 ProVSVivo X300 Evs OPPO Find N5VS