Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra vs Vivo X300s
29.1Performance64.4
55.1Display78.5
56.4Camera78.1
41.7Battery88.7
73.3Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra11 spec wins — Vivo X300s
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300s wins this phone face-off, 76.8 to 46.7, pulling ahead mainly in battery (+47) and performance (+35). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra
- 67% higher Optical zoom: 5 x vs 3 x
- 10% higher Pixel density: 496 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300s
- Stronger performance score: 64 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 79 vs 55
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 56
- Stronger battery score: 89 vs 42
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi+10% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 1,500 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body | — | 91.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | — |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 5 x+67% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,500 mAh | 7,100 mAh+58% |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 90 W+260% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 208 g+4% | 217 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Stainless steel | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2.5) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra | Vivo X300s |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs realme 13 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 40VSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Tecno Spark 50 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultravs Infinix GT 30VSVivo X300svs RedMagic 11S ProVSVivo X300svs Redmi K70 UltraVSVivo X300svs nubia NaviX UltraVSVivo X300svs OnePlus 13VS