Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro
29.1Performance74.5
54Display73.2
65.9Camera72
55.1Battery79.9
73.3Features78.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra12 spec wins — Vivo X200 Pro
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X200 Pro wins this phone face-off, 75.2 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and battery (+25). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- 25% higher Front camera: 40 MP vs 32 MP
- 13% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 452 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X200 Pro
- Stronger performance score: 75 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 73 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 72 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 80 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 79 vs 73
- Lower launch price: $1,099 vs $1,399
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+2% | 6.78 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1260x2800 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi+13% | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 |
| AnTuTu 10 | 500,000Top 77% | 2,550,000+410%Top 6% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Top 78% | 2,800+211%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Top 72% | 8,600+225%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.57 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+8% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP+25% | 32 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 30 W+100% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g | 223 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.5 mm+3% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 15 (Funtouch OS 15) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 4 years+33% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X200 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi 12VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs OnePlus 10TVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S25 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Xiaomi 15 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraVSVivo X200 Provs OnePlus 13VS