Skip to content
InnoReviews

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs vivo X200 Pro mini

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
51.1Inno Score
VS
WINNER
vivo X200 Pro mini
72.8Inno Score
29.1Performance71.3
54Display73.8
65.9Camera65.5
55.1Battery74.7
73.3Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra11 spec wins — vivo X200 Pro mini

InnoReviews verdict

vivo X200 Pro mini wins this phone face-off, 72.8 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and display (+20). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

  • 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
  • 33% higher Optical zoom: 4 x vs 3 x
  • 25% higher Front camera: 40 MP vs 32 MP
  • 11% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 460 ppi
  • Has eSIM — the other doesn't

Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Pro mini

  • Stronger performance score: 71 vs 29
  • Stronger display score: 74 vs 54
  • Stronger battery score: 75 vs 55
  • Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
  • 317% higher ultra-wide: 50 MP vs 12 MP

Display

Display comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
Screen size6.9 ″+9%6.31 ″
Panel typeAMOLEDLTPO AMOLED
Resolution3200x14401216x2640
Pixel density511 ppi+11%460 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Peak brightness1,200 nits4,500 nits+275%
Screen-to-body—90.5 %

Performance

Performance comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
ChipsetSamsung Exynos 990MediaTek Dimensity 9400
AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared500,0002,439,691Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—716,503Top 28%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—837,229Top 29%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—328,282Top 35%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—557,677Top 24%
Geekbench 6 (single)900Bottom 22%2,589+188%Top 21%
Geekbench 6 (multi)2,650Bottom 27%8,078+205%Top 18%
Wild Life Extreme stability—48 %Bottom 7%
RAM (max)12 GB16 GB+33%
Storage options128GB / 256GB / 512GB256/512GB/1TB
Storage typeUFS 3.0UFS 4.0

Camera

Camera comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
Main camera108 MP+116%50 MP
Main aperturef/1.8f/1.57
Ultra-wide12 MP50 MP+317%
Telephoto48 MP50 MP+4%
Optical zoom4 x+33%3 x
Max video8K@24fps4K@60fps
Front camera40 MP+25%32 MP
OISYesYes

Battery

Battery comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
Capacity5,000 mAh5,700 mAh+14%
Wired charging45 W90 W+100%
Wireless charging15 W30 W+100%

Design

Design comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
Weight222 g187 g+16%
Thickness8.8 mm8.2 mm+7%
IP ratingIP68IP68/IP69
Frame materialAluminumAluminum

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
5GYesYes
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.05.4
NFCYesYes
USBUSB-C 3.2USB-C 2.0
eSIMYesNo

Software

Software comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
OS at launchAndroid 10 (One UI 2)Android 15 (OriginOS 5)
OS update pledge3 years—

Audio

Audio comparison: Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra versus vivo X200 Pro mini
SpecSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravivo X200 Pro mini
Stereo speakersYesYes
3.5mm jackNoNo

Related comparisons

Try another matchup