Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs vivo X200 Ultra
29.1Performance74.3
54Display76.1
65.9Camera75.8
55.1Battery82.8
73.3Features86.7
6 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra11 spec wins — vivo X200 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
vivo X200 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 77.9 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+45) and battery (+28). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 116% higher Main camera: 108 MP vs 50 MP
- Has eSIM — the other doesn't
Reasons to pick the vivo X200 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 74 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 76 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 76 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 83 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 87 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.2 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,062+240%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 9,410+255%Top 11% |
| Wild Life Extreme stability | — | 49 %Bottom 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP+116% | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.69 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+8% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh+20% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 13.6 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g+4% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.7 mm+1% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 15 (OriginOS 5) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | — |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | vivo X200 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSvivo X200 Ultravs OPPO Find N6VSvivo X200 Ultravs POCO F9 UltraVSvivo X200 Ultravs Vivo X Fold6VSvivo X200 Ultravs Honor Magic7 ProVS