Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vivo X300
29.1Performance85.4
54Display73.5
65.9Camera78.1
55.1Battery87.2
73.3Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra15 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+56) and battery (+32). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 33% higher Optical zoom: 4 x vs 3 x
- 11% higher Pixel density: 511 ppi vs 461 ppi
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+9% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi+11% | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | 3,416,530+583% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,446+283%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 9,843+271%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 50 MP+4% |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+33% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,040 mAh+21% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 17.5 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g | 190 g+14% |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8 mm+10% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS