Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
29.1Performance93.3
54Display82.3
65.9Camera84.6
55.1Battery91.5
73.3Features84
4 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra15 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+64) and battery (+36). Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 29
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 54
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 66
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 73
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.9 ″+1% | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 511 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 1,200 nits | 4,500 nits+275% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 500,000 | 4,085,695+717% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 900Bottom 22% | 3,730+314%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,650Bottom 27% | 11,494+334%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.0 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 48 MP | 200 MP+317% |
| Optical zoom | 4 x+8% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 222 g+4% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.8 mm | 8.2 mm+7% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 10 (One UI 2) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 3 years | 5 years+67% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Infinix NOTE EdgeVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs TECNO CAMON 30VSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Google Pixel 7 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S20 Ultravs Xiaomi Mi 11VSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS

