Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Vivo X300
43.7Performance85.4
57.1Display73.5
72Camera78.1
55.1Battery87.2
78.7Features84
3 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra15 spec wins — Vivo X300
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 wins this phone face-off, 81.8 to 57.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+42) and battery (+32). Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- 233% higher Optical zoom: 10 x vs 3 x
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300
- Stronger performance score: 85 vs 44
- Stronger display score: 74 vs 57
- Stronger camera score: 78 vs 72
- Stronger battery score: 87 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 79
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″+8% | 6.31 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1216x2640 |
| Pixel density | 500 ppi+8% | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,750 nits | 4,500 nits+157% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.1 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2200 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| AnTuTu | 1,100,000 | 3,416,530+211% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600Top 43% | 3,446+115%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150Top 46% | 9,843+137%Top 8% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.68 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP+400% |
| Optical zoom | 10 x+233% | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 4K@120fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,040 mAh+21% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 90 W+100% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 17.5 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g | 190 g+17% |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8 mm+11% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 12 (One UI 4.1) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 5 years+25% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs Huawei Pocket 2VSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs realme Narzo 80 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs Infinix NOTE 50 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs iQOO Z11 5G (India)VSVivo X300vs OPPO Find X9 ProVSVivo X300vs OnePlus 15VSVivo X300vs Xiaomi 17T ProVSVivo X300vs Huawei Mate 80 RS Ultimate DesignVS