Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
43.7Performance93.3
57.1Display82.3
72Camera84.6
55.1Battery91.5
78.7Features84
2 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra17 spec wins — Vivo X300 Ultra
InnoReviews verdict
Vivo X300 Ultra wins this phone face-off, 88.1 to 57.8, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+50) and battery (+36). Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- 170% higher Optical zoom: 10 x vs 3.7 x
Reasons to pick the Vivo X300 Ultra
- Stronger performance score: 93 vs 44
- Stronger display score: 82 vs 57
- Stronger camera score: 85 vs 72
- Stronger battery score: 92 vs 55
- Stronger features score: 84 vs 79
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.8 ″ | 6.82 ″ |
| Panel type | LTPO AMOLED | LTPO AMOLED |
| Resolution | 3088x1440 | 1440x3168 |
| Pixel density | 500 ppi | 510 ppi+2% |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz+20% |
| Peak brightness | 1,750 nits | 4,500 nits+157% |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.3 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 2200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| AnTuTu | 1,100,000 | 4,085,695+271% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,600Top 43% | 3,730+133%Top 3% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,150Top 46% | 11,494+177%Top 3% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Storage options | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP+85% |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 50 MP+317% |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP+1900% |
| Optical zoom | 10 x+170% | 3.7 x |
| Max video | 8K@24fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 40 MP | 50 MP+25% |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh+32% |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 100 W+122% |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 40 W+167% |
| Active use endurance | — | 16 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 229 g+1% | 232 g |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm | 8.2 mm+8% |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP68/IP69 |
| Frame material | Aluminum | Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 12 (One UI 4.1) | Android 16 (OriginOS 6) |
| OS update pledge | 4 years | 5 years+25% |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs Huawei Pocket 2VSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs realme Narzo 80 Pro 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs Infinix NOTE 50 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultravs iQOO Z11 5G (India)VSVivo X300 Ultravs iQOO 15 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs OPPO Find X9 UltraVSVivo X300 Ultravs Honor Magic8 ProVSVivo X300 Ultravs realme GT 8 ProVS