Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
79.3Performance60.9
63.6Display58.6
47.3Camera46.9
54.2Battery47.9
94.7Features94.7
8 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy S25+1 spec wins — Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Galaxy S25+ wins this phone face-off, 66.3 to 58.4, pulling ahead mainly in performance (+18) and battery (+6). Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Stronger performance score: 79 vs 61
- Stronger display score: 64 vs 59
- Stronger battery score: 54 vs 48
- 80% higher Wired charging: 45 W vs 25 W
- 45% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,153 vs 7,000
- Lower launch price: $1,000 vs $1,900
Reasons to pick the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6
- 13% higher Screen size: 7.6 ″ vs 6.7 ″
Display
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 6.7 ″ | 7.6 ″+13% |
| Panel type | Dynamic AMOLED 2X | Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X |
| Resolution | 1440x3120 | 1856x2160 |
| Pixel density | 513 ppi+37% | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 2,600 nits | 2,600 nits |
| Screen-to-body | — | 90.5 % |
Performance
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy |
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,763,072Top 22% | 1,820,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 866,625Top 16% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 996,402Top 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 347,621Top 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 552,424Top 28% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,141+38%Top 11% | 2,270Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,153+45%Top 7% | 7,000Top 23% |
| RAM (max) | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage options | 256/512GB | 256/512GB/1TB |
| Storage type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 |
Camera
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Ultra-wide | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3 x | 3 x |
| Max video | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
| Front camera | 12 MP+20% | 10 MP |
| OIS | Yes | Yes |
Battery
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4,900 mAh+11% | 4,400 mAh |
| Wired charging | 45 W+80% | 25 W |
| Wireless charging | 15 W | 15 W |
| Active use endurance | — | 10 h |
Design
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight | 190 g+21% | 239 g |
| Thickness | 7.3 mm+40% | 12.1 mm |
| IP rating | IP68 | IP48 |
| Frame material | Armor Aluminum | Armor Aluminum |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 7 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB-C 3.2 | USB-C 3.2 |
| eSIM | Yes | Yes |
Software
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| OS at launch | Android 15 (One UI 7) | Android 14 (One UI 6.1.1) |
| OS update pledge | 7 years | 7 years |
Audio
| Spec | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
Related comparisons
Samsung Galaxy S25+vs Infinix Note 60 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs OPPO Reno15 ProVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs Huawei Pura X MaxVSSamsung Galaxy S25+vs iPhone 16 Pro MaxVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Google Pixel 8 ProVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs OPPO A7 Pro Max 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs REDMI Note 15 Pro+ 5GVSSamsung Galaxy Z Fold 6vs Huawei Pura 70VS